Member Log In:

Login
If not yet a member:
Register

Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds
Cyborg Buddha Project





Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view

whats new at ieet

Obama, culture and Magick

Andy Profiled in The Scotsman

Helen Jaques reviews Nature debate on H+ featuring Miah, de Grey and Warwick

Russell about to publish Voices of Disbelief

Aspergers as Gift

comments

Dana on 'Aspergers as Gift' (2008 12 03)

Ruth on 'Aspergers as Gift' (2008 12 02)

darshana bihani on 'Don’t Change Your “Self” - Change the World' (2008 12 02)

vog on 'Religion and Transhumanism pt1' (2008 12 01)

Patrick on 'Maximizing Change Effectiveness' (2008 12 01)




ieet forums

Sam G: Transhumanism (5)

jake: Irresitible (1)

extropian.pharmer: 11-Rapture book review and Longevity Dividend capstone paper (18)

Oscar: Need a manufacturer for my nutritional supplements range of products!!! (3)

Stuart Ballard: Empowerment enhances cognition (1)



"We should all be concerned about the future because we will have to spend the rest of our lives there."
Charles Kettering (1876-1958) Engineer and Inventor





Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv



IEET > Vision > Futurism > Fellows > Mike Treder

PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums subscribe


The Future, Actually


Mike Treder

Mike Treder


Responsible Nanotechnology


Posted: Jun 7, 2007

We talk a lot about the future here—or, rather, we talk about a number of different possible futures. But what will the future actually be?

Barring the existence of (and our access to) parallel branching universes, we actually will experience only a single future. No matter how many different futures we way anticipate or speculate about, only one will come to pass.

Which one?

  • Desktop Nanofactories - Every home has one, and every user can create any product for a few pennies per ounce (plus fees, if any, for downloaded product designs). Sophisticated CAD systems allow users to customize designs or invent new products at will. Bottom-up manufacturing means the economy is turned upside down, almost literally, as consumers become producers, and corporations scramble for relevance. Ingredients are now in place for a rapidly evolving and probably unstable new arms race. Tight technical restrictions are required to prevent illicit production of dangerous artifacts, and debates rage over the need for and dangers of ubiquitous surveillance. Many of societies longest-lasting problems have been solved, while many new ones have taken their place.

    Nanofactory

    Note: Most of CRN’s efforts are placed in analyzing this particular near future (circa 2015-2025) when personal nanofactories have been developed and are used extensively. We’re aware, of course, that other momentous technologies likely will emerge during that period, but our primary emphasis is on molecular manufacturing, because we believe it will be the most transformative, and potentially disruptive, during the next two decades.

  • Jetsons - You remember this future (if you’re old enough, that is): the one in which every family has a domestic robot; hot, delicious meals are ordered and produced at the touch of a button; people zoom around in jet cars between apartments and office towers that soar miles into the air; and so on…

  • Cyborgs - Robots, computers, and humans (some, at least) merge into cyborgs. the variations here are endless.

    Cyborgs

  • Bio-Morphing - Using techniques of genetic engineering and advanced nanomedicine, the human body becomes elastic, a designer’s palette for experimentation in form, function, and frivolity. People look back at early body modification enthusiasts—those indulging in piercing, tattoos, and implants—and laugh at how quaintly conventional they seem.

    Tattoo

  • Human Speciation and Diaspora - An extension of the two futures above is one in which humans differentiate into a number of distinct species and habitats. If molecular manufacturing and other technologies enable easy access to space and ready colonization of our solar system, then almost without limit new homes may be available for beings descended from humans who bear little resemblance to their ancestors.

  • AI - Vastly more powerful computers and better software writing finally result in the achievement of artificial general intelligence. If it is constrained by some form of built-in ”friendly” (to humans) motivation, then maybe it’s a good thing. If not, well then all bets are off.

  • Singularity - The ever accelerating progress of technology and rapid changes in the mode of human life lead inexorably to a singularity. At that point, the dizzying pace of development surpasses our unaugmented human ability to predict what is coming next. (In practical terms, we may always be able to see what the near future holds, but the range of “near” will continue to shrink as the metaphorical event horizon comes closer and closer.)

  • Techno-Apocalypse - Bad stuff happens. The machines take over, or a hyperwar kills us all, or out-of control GMOs destroy Nature, or grey goo eats everything. Very bad.

    Terminator

  • Dystopia - Take any item from the previous category, plus other possibilities like rampant global climate change, a worldwide economic collapse, the pandemic to end all pandemics, or just an old-fashioned nuclear war, and you’ve got the makings of a thoroughly depressing future.

    Sketchpostapocalypsev03

    CLICK HERE FOR INFORMATION ON THIS IMAGE.

  • World Government - Continued economic globalization, a desire for better coordinated international response to terrorism, and a recognition that the challenges of ubiquitous molecular manufacturing can best be met with a unified approach: all this leads to the eventual end of state sovereignty. (I have predicted elsewhere—apart from my role with CRN—that before 2030, some form of international federation or global governmental structure will emerge that exercises ultimate authority over world affairs.)

  • Plus ça change - The more things change, the more they stay the same. Years pass, significant changes emerge, and yet, somehow, we still find ourselves looking forward and wondering, when is that startling future ever going to arrive?

So, what do you foresee? All of the above? None of the above? Some of the above? What is the future, actually?


Mike Treder is a fellow of the IEET, and the Executive Director of the non-profit Center for Responsible Nanotechnology, an organization working to raise awareness of the issues presented by advanced nanotechnology.

PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


The safe implementation of molecular nanotechnology SENS would only qualify as a minor subcategory of the potential benefits ...include extremely cheap energy, personal transport, manufacturing capabilities, pure water, massively improved agriculture, computing, communications technology…Now modern tech is biased up by molecular naotech...so wish SENS will perform better...4engr.com



YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Aubrey on extending healthy life - a lot

Previous entry: SimCanada, Googlopticon and the Singularity

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376