Blog | Events | Multimedia | Forums | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    





Subscribe to: Monthly newsletter Daily news feed Changesurfer Radio Blog feeds



Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Metaphysics of Science

Life Inc. video dispatches and audiobook available

Blackford and Schuklenk interviewed about 50 Voices

How to Redesign our Communities for the Internet Age

Don’t become a Cyborg by Accident (literally) - It can be Fatal

From Space, Watts, Bits, and Dreams

Transhumanism F.A.Q. : Is Aging A Moral Good?

Postapocalyptic Gardens

The Difficult Questions of ‘Personhood’

7th European Conference on Computing And Philosophy


comments

fairyhedgehog on 'The Difficult Questions of 'Personhood'' (Jul 4, 2009)

Forrest Higgs on 'How to Redesign our Communities for the Internet Age' (Jul 3, 2009)

Milton Martinez on 'Don’t become a Cyborg by Accident (literally) - It can be Fatal' (Jul 3, 2009)

Vx on 'Transhumanism F.A.Q. : Is Aging A Moral Good?' (Jul 3, 2009)

grey eminence on 'From Space, Watts, Bits, and Dreams' (Jul 2, 2009)








Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv


Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List





IEET > Security > Military > Fellows > Mike Treder

PrintEmailpermalink • (0) CommentsDiscuss in Forums subscribe


Future War Revisited


Mike Treder

Mike Treder


Responsible Nanotechnology


Posted: Nov 20, 2008

Think of a futuristic war scenario where soldiers are firing smart weapons from the confines of their command centres.weapons that are capable of intercepting and destroying virtually all enemy attack weapons and yet, they are fired from unmanned vehicles thereby minimising all possibilities of human casualties.

This is the promise that nanotechnology has in store for the global defence industry, which is pumping billions of dollars in nanotech research, examining how nano science can improve defence capabilities. Potential benefits of nanotechnology in the defence industry include stronger, lighter and less-expensive materials and enhanced protection for military personnel.

Robot-army-3

That's the opening of an article in Financial Express titled "Small Wonders" [hat tip to Nanotechnology Now]. What they describe in that excerpt represents the type of advanced nanotechnology impact on warfighting that CRN has been warning about since at least 2005, when we provided this assessment about one kind of risk for a Millennium Project survey:

Large quantities of smart weapons — especially miniaturized, robotic weapons and intelligent, target-seeking ammunition without reliable remote off-switches could lead to unexpected injury to combatants and civilians, destruction to infrastructure, and environmental pollution.
The rest of the Financial Express article deals mostly with 1st and 2nd generation nanotechnologies, although not explicitly. In fact, it tends to confuse some of the expected benefits of advanced nanotech ("visions of lightweight materials many times stronger than steel") with earlier generation projections.

We've noted this sort of problem many times before, of course. It's difficult to keep writers from making such mistakes when even so-called experts in the field will sometimes conflate the risks and benefits of molecular manufacturing with other less revolutionary nanoscale technologies.

Crisis

For a more accurate and more complete look at the future of warfare, especially in the context of advanced nanotechnology, take a look at this presentation that I gave at the World Future Society annual conference in 2007 (and subsequently presented to a group of officers at the U.S. Naval War College).

Further understanding of the potential impacts of emerging technologies on waging war can be gained by reading a convincing future scenario called "Crisis in Zefra," prepared by Canada's Directorate of Land Strategic Concepts.

No matter how you look at it, the future looks more precarious than the present, unless we are fortunate and suddenly mature as a species before it's too late.


Mike Treder is the Managing Director of the IEET, and former Executive Director of the non-profit Center for Responsible Nanotechnology.
PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Prospicience (The Art and Science of Looking Ahead) and Geoengineering

Previous entry: Don’t Change Your “Self” - Change the World

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376