Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Countdown

Ben Goertzel offering accredited summer course on The Singularity through Rutgers University

Space Exploration Part 3: The Big Picture

Morality, With Limits

Is Earth past the tipping point?

Time Machine

If Only We Were Smarter!

The Baroque Body: The Role of Body Modification in Scott Westerfeld´s Uglies

Tech Pace Fast, Opposition Uncertain: IEET Readers

Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype


comments

veronica on 'Morality, With Limits' (Mar 21, 2010)

Marianne Waldow on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

CygnusX1 on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

Mike Treder on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

CygnusX1 on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

IEET > Rights > Economic > Life > Access > Health > Vision > Technoprogressivism > Staff > Mike Treder

PrintEmailpermalink • (6) Comments • (30) Hits •  subscribeShare on facebook Stumble This




Technoprogressives Should Favor Progressive Gains


Mike Treder
Mike Treder
Ethical Technology

Posted: May 2, 2009

Many in the United States see evidence of a tectonic shift in public opinion over major issues that have gone nowhere for years.

Take gay marriage, for instance. For the first time, marriage equality is supported by a plurality of Americans. The states of Massachusetts, Connecticut and Iowa already have made it legal, with Vermont coming along in September. California and New York, two of the most populous states in the union, may not be far behind. As hard as it would have been to believe only two years ago, it now seems possible that a majority of states might legalize gay marriage within the next several years. That’s change we can believe in!

Technoprogressives should welcome and celebrate such news.

On another front, the prospects for decriminalizing possession of marijuana in the U.S.—and even the potential for legal distribution, with regulation and taxation—seem to be improving rapidly. President Obama may have downplayed the idea during an online town hall meeting, but that can be seen as just politics. It’s doubtful that he would put much effort into opposing a proposal for federal legalization if and when it reaches the legislative stage.

Again, look back a year or two ago, and such changes would seem just a dream. Today, it’s another issue that American technoprogressives should champion.

Other liberal “hot button” causes also seem likely to move closer to passage within the next year or two. Whether it is reform of the health care industry (with a shift to a single payer system gradually coming closer), or adoption of a carbon cap and trade scheme to combat global warming, or a truly progressive income tax (eventually returning the U.S. to something close to the rates of the 1950s), or an outright ban on handguns—admittedly, a long shot (no pun intended) for now, but we can hope—the prospects of all these idealistic dreams becoming reality seems actually worth believing in, and fighting for.

Assuming such things could happen under an Obama administration with a Democratic House and Senate, then what else might be possible over the next eight years? Outlawing capital punishment, everywhere and forever? Totally ending the bogus “war on drugs”? Letting non-violent offenders out of prison? Instituting a basic income guarantee? Offering free municipal college educations for anybody who wants one and can get passing grades?

These are the kinds of issues that, if passed, will clear the way for even more ambitious proposals on the technoprogressive platform.

  • If we want to see all humans—and transhumans—protected in their rights for self-augmentation, enhancement, or modification, then we have to promote the concept of individual human rights today.
  • If we desire to live in a world where peace and security are considered a given everywhere around the globe, then we have to support peace efforts in the Middle East and elsewhere, especially when those initiatives involve transnational cooperation.
  • If we would hope to see the adoption of a global bill of rights that promises fundamental freedoms, health, welfare, and education for all, then we had better work today for the rights of women, children, gays, people of color, and all minorities to receive the same protection that the privileged classes have always taken for granted.

This is an agenda for technoprogressives in the year 2009. Dream big, but celebrate the incremental steps too, for their accomplishment will make our long-term goals much more likely to be achieved.

 


Mike Treder is the Managing Director of the IEET, and former Executive Director of the non-profit Center for Responsible Nanotechnology.
PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


How can we make Technoprogressives more appealing to the conservatives out there? Right now, it seems that the only thing about Technoprogressives that is appealing to them is the cool name (on which they might say to themselves, "Hey, I love Technology and I love Progress"!)



Hector, it sounds to me like you are proposing an impossibility. Conservatives by definition are wary about social progress and generally not receptive to new technologies either.



Oh, well if you define "social progress" as "becoming more liberal," I guess you're right. But that definition is not obvious from the word "progressive." That's all I was saying.

Concerning new technology that extend the life of a person, even if it means a life of low quality - conservatives are all for that, aren't they?



Um, you mean like embryonic stem cell research? Nope, most cultural conservatives (at least in the U.S.) oppose it.



You're right about that one, but they're fine with /adult/ stem cell research.
The very fact that we can both come up with technologies that conservatives like and ones they don't like demonstrates the point I was making.

The point is that "Technoprogressive" is a confusing term if it's intended to refer only to those technologies promoting liberal causes. And if it refers to areas in which science and technology plays almost no role whatsoever, such as gay marriage, then we might as well toss out the "techno" prefix, and ensure that everyone knows that "progressive" equals "liberal."



It's not intended to be confusing, but the "progressive" part of technoprogressive does imply more than simply promoting the progress of technology. Technoprogressives are politically progressive (leaning left), and we support the safe development and responsible use of emerging technologies to expand human potential and to improve our societies.



YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Pirates (Digital and Otherwise)

Previous entry: A World Without Suffering?

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376