Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Countdown

Ben Goertzel offering accredited summer course on The Singularity through Rutgers University

Space Exploration Part 3: The Big Picture

Morality, With Limits

Is Earth past the tipping point?

Time Machine

If Only We Were Smarter!

The Baroque Body: The Role of Body Modification in Scott Westerfeld´s Uglies

Tech Pace Fast, Opposition Uncertain: IEET Readers

Autism And Vaccines: Why People Still Believe The Hype


comments

veronica on 'Morality, With Limits' (Mar 21, 2010)

Marianne Waldow on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

CygnusX1 on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

Mike Treder on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

CygnusX1 on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

IEET > Rights > Disability > FreeThought > Economic > ReproRights > Life > Access > Health > Vision > Technoprogressivism > Staff > Mike Treder

PrintEmailpermalink • (5) Comments • (46) Hits •  subscribeShare on facebook Stumble This




The playing field is tilted—in our favor!


Mike Treder
Mike Treder
Ethical Technology

Posted: May 18, 2009

If we take a long view of human civilization and history, it is hard not to be impressed by how far we have come. Sure, we could always do more, and yes, I’m as impatient as you for the next steps forward. But it doesn’t hurt once in a while to pat ourselves on our collective backs for what we’ve accomplished over the last few thousand years.

When I was in high school, way back in the late 1960s, the pleasant little prose poem titled Desiderata, composed by Max Ehrmann in 1927, became popular among the love generation.

I won’t reprint the entire thing here, but if you’re one of the few people who’ve never heard or read it, you should. Let me just offer these stanzas to begin today’s sermon:

Beyond a wholesome discipline,
be gentle with yourself.
You are a child of the universe
no less than the trees and the stars;
you have a right to be here.
And whether or not it is clear to you,
no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.

With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams,
it is still a beautiful world.

The universe as a whole may or not be unfolding as it should (I rather think it is unfolding as it must), but if we take a long view of human civilization and history, it is hard not to be impressed by how far we have come.

Sure, we could always do more, and yes, I’m as impatient as you for the next steps forward. But it doesn’t hurt once in a while to pat ourselves on our collective backs for what we’ve accomplished over the last few thousand years.

  • We invented philosophy and used it to make logical sense of our place in the universe.
  • We invented the scientific method and used it to begin understanding the natural world.
  • We invented technology and applied science to improve human lives and human communities.
  • We dramatically decreased infant mortality and increased human life expectancy in many places around the world.
  • Poverty once was the lot of all but a tiny percentage of humans; today the large majority of people in the developed world live far better than the kings and queens of the past.
  • Education, literacy, and rationality have been on the rise for centuries (even if it’s easy to forget that sometimes).
  • Many, many fewer people die today as a result of war, crime, and other conflicts than in the past.
  • More people are living lives of (relative) freedom than at any time in history.

To what can we attribute all this success? What are we doing right? Can we expect it to continue?

Although the challenges we’ll encounter in the 21st century are daunting, to say the least, we clearly have reason to be optimistic, assuming the past can be taken as any indicator of future potential. As I like to say, the playing field is tilted in our favor.



Throughout the history of human civilization—and especially since the invention of modern democracy—those who favor making the fruits of progress available to everyone and proactively expanding the protection of human rights have had a nearly unbroken string of successes. Of course, there have been setbacks, and far too many people have suffered during the struggle, but overall, the engine of progressiveness keeps puffing away and pulling the mass of sluggish inertia along behind it.

Conservatives (nearly all of whom are genuinely and understandably motivated to avoid sudden jolts that might cause more harm than help) never cease trying to slow or prevent the gains of progressivism. They often succeed in keeping the center from moving as quickly as many of us would like, but with the playing field tilted away from them, they must inevitably continue losing ground.

For this we should be grateful, but never complacent.


Mike Treder is the Managing Director of the IEET, and former Executive Director of the non-profit Center for Responsible Nanotechnology.
PrintEmailpermalinkDiscuss in Forums • Send to: ¡ del.icio.us icon ¡ Digg icon


COMMENTS


I liked that poem. I, too, have a comment on it, and am curious about your comment:

"The universe as a whole may or not be unfolding as it should (I rather think it is unfolding as it must)"

That was a thought-provoking comment. I'm curious what the difference is between 'should' and 'must' in this context.

"You are a child of the universe
no less than the trees and the stars;"

That sounds a little unusual to me. It's like saying, "A Rolls Royce is a car no less than a Matchbox car."



To me, the word 'should' implies a human moral judgment, as if there is a *right* and a *wrong* way for the universe to unfold. My assumption is that the laws of physics are the only constraints that apply, and since they are fundamental, the universe must follow them. Nothing resembling choice or design is involved.



Oh, I see, thanks. I guess I was confused why the universe "must" yield stars and trees and people. I was connecting that line of the poem with the verse before it, but you were apparently treating it independently. OK, got it.


"We invented philosophy and used it to make logical sense of our place in the universe. "

Perhaps you mean to say we TRIED to use it.
It seems to me that the vast majority of the world's philosophies would make ILLogical sense of our (ie. humans') place in the universe. Very, very few people go with Carl Sagan's quote, "Who are we? We find that we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people. "



Maybe the playing field isn't level because a fair percentage of Conservatives are actually PRO- progressivism and human rights.



"For this we should be grateful, but never complacent."

You probably meant this statement to apply to Conservatives, who "must inevitably continue losing ground. " However, one could also apply it to the efforts of Conservatives "nearly all of whom are genuinely and understandably motivated to avoid sudden jolts that might cause more harm than help."



YOUR COMMENT

Name:

Email:

Location:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Next entry: Choosing Our Imaginary Communities and Identities

Previous entry: If I Can't Dance, I Don't Want to Be Part of Your Revolution!

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376