peter hugo mcclure on 'Protopanpsychism and the consciousness conundrum, or why we shouldn't assume uploads' (2008 10 10)

Albasun S.r.l. on 'Enhanced Athletes? It's Only Natural' (2008 10 10)

Steven Earl Salmony on 'What We Could Do With A Trillion Dollars' (2008 10 09)

Scott on 'Cholesterol gene related to both mental acuity and longevity' (2008 10 09)

gene on 'The End of Capitalism?' (2008 10 08)

Percent of 'working-age' adults employed in 2050 in Europe and N. America ( surveys)

extropian.pharmer: 11-Rapture book review and Longevity Dividend capstone paper (18)

Oscar: Need a manufacturer for my nutritional supplements range of products!!! (3)

Stuart Ballard: Empowerment enhances cognition (1)

extropian.pharmer: 10- Implementing the Longevity Dividend- Methusalah or Bust (2)

extropian.pharmer: 09-Healthy Inter-generational Bonding -pt1&2; (15)

"The defining political conflict of the 21st century will be the battle for life and death. On one side stand the partisans of mortality, who counsel humanity to quietly accept our morbid fate and go gentle into that good night. On the other is the party of life, who rage against the dying of the light and yearn to extend the enjoyment of healthy life to as many as possible for as long as possible."
Ron Bailey

Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

IEET > Vision > CyborgBuddha > Directors > Mark Walker

Print • Email • permalink • Discuss in Forums •

In Praise of Bio-Happiness (IEET White Paper 02)

Mark Walker

Mark Walker

IEET Monographs

Posted: Dec 31, 2006

Abstract: Most agree that our lives and our world are better if we are happier. So linking the moral goal of greater happiness with our biological understanding of happiness seems obvious. Let us think of the position that it is permissible for individuals to make this linkage—to use pharmacology and other technologies in the service of increased happiness—as the ‘bio-happiness’ proposal. Several different technologies might be used in pursuit of this goal, e.g., pharmacological agents (“happy pills” ) might be developed, or pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to select embryos with genes associated with a high level of happiness, or genetically engineering embryos for happiness. Most of the paper is devoted to defending bio-happiness against criticisms. The field of which may be characterized as follows:

(1) Happiness is not of moral importance.
(2) Bio-happiness cannot increase our happiness.
(3) Bio-happiness will come at too great a cost to other moral values.

Download the Complete Document (PDF)

Mark Walker Ph.D. serves on the IEET Board of Directors, and is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at New Mexico State University, where he occupies the Richard L. Hedden Endowed Chair.

Print • Email • permalink • Discuss in Forums • Send to: ¡

COMMENTS

YOUR COMMENT

Next entry: An Eschatological Taxonomy

Previous entry: Techno-cultural literacy in 2007