Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies






The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States. Please give as you are able, and help support our work for a brighter future.


Search the IEET
Subscribe and Contribute to:


Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view




whats new at ieet

America’s best-kept sex secret: lots of us don’t want it

Living Machines 2015

Free Will Does Not Exist - Should it be a Transhumanist Enhancement?

Vita-More, Rothblatt, Hughes @ Juniata H+ Conference

Will Transhumanism Lead to Greater Freedom?

The Yuck Factor — What Planned Parenthood Smears, Homophobia, & Middle School Have in Common


ieet books

Envisioning Politics 2.0
Author
David Wood and Alexander Karran eds.


comments

jayjay on 'Transhumanism – The Final Religion?' (Jul 30, 2015)

Pandora on 'Four political futures: which will you choose?' (Jul 30, 2015)

rms on 'Free Will Does Not Exist - Should it be a Transhumanist Enhancement?' (Jul 30, 2015)

jayjay on 'Free Will Does Not Exist - Should it be a Transhumanist Enhancement?' (Jul 30, 2015)

Kris Notaro on 'Danaher Publishes Human Enhancement, Social Solidarity and the Distribution of Responsibility' (Jul 29, 2015)

Peter Wicks on 'Zoltan Istvan's "Teleological Egocentric Functionalism": An approach to viable politics?' (Jul 29, 2015)

hume on 'Free Will Does Not Exist - Should it be a Transhumanist Enhancement?' (Jul 29, 2015)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



JET

Enframing the Flesh: Heidegger, Transhumanism, and the Body as “Standing Reserve”

Moral Enhancement and Political Realism

Intelligent Technologies and Lost Life

Hottest Articles of the Last Month


If We Can Achieve Gay Marriage and Legal Pot, We Can Fix Climate Change Too
Jul 18, 2015
(24588) Hits
(1) Comments

Transhumanism: there are [at least] ten different philosophical categories; which one(s) are you?
Jul 8, 2015
(9194) Hits
(12) Comments

Robosapiens – merging with machines will improve humanity at an exponential rate
Jul 7, 2015
(8270) Hits
(1) Comments

Transhumanism – The Final Religion?
Jul 16, 2015
(8256) Hits
(6) Comments



IEET > Security > SciTech > Life > Innovation > Health > Vision

Print Email permalink (1) Comments (2376) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


Empathy, Neurochemistry, and the Dramatic Arc: Paul Zak at the Future of StoryTelling 2012



Paul Zak

Charles Melcher

Posted: Dec 11, 2012


“The emotionally charged story recounted at the beginning Dr. Paul Zak’s film—of a terminally ill two-year-old named Ben and his father—offers a simple yet remarkable case study in how the human brain responds to effective storytelling. As part of his study, Dr. Zak, a founding pioneer in the emerging field of neuroeconomics, closely monitored the neural activity of hundreds of people who viewed Ben’s story. What he discovered is that even the simplest narrative, if it is highly engaging and follows the classic dramatic arc outlined by the German playwright Gustav Freytag, can evoke powerful empathic responses associated with specific neurochemicals, namely cortisol and oxytocin. Those brain responses, in turn, can translate readily into concrete action—in the case of Dr. Zak’s study subjects, generous donations to charity and even monetary gifts to fellow participants. By contrast, stories that fail to follow the dramatic arc of rising action/climax/denouement—no matter how outwardly happy or pleasant those stories may be—elicit little if any emotional or chemical response, and correspond to a similar absence of action. Dr. Zak’s conclusions hold profound implications for the role of storytelling in a vast range of professional and public milieus.” - Melcher


Listen/View


Print Email permalink (1) Comments (2377) Hits •  subscribe Share on facebook Stumble This submit to reddit submit to digg


COMMENTS


Wait a second, the first video contains a somebody talking, I assume that the second video also contains somebody talking, or does it just have that image which was shown for the said 100 seconds?? Was there an assumption that the human voice holds no effect on the reaction of the participants?



YOUR COMMENT (IEET's comment policy)

Login or Register to post a comment.

Next entry: Merging with machines could become reality in your lifetime

Previous entry: The Inevitability of Intelligence and Critical Thinking Leading to Empathy and Altruism

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | AFRICAN FUTURES PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter |
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
56 Daleville School Rd., Willington CT 06279 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376