Blog | Events | Multimedia | About | Purpose | Programs | Publications | Staff | Contact | Join   
     Login      Register    




Technoprogressive? BioConservative? Huh?
Quick overview of biopolitical points of view


whats new at ieet
Countdown

Ben Goertzel offering accredited summer course on The Singularity through Rutgers University

Space Exploration Part 3: The Big Picture

Morality, with limits

Is Earth past the tipping point?

Hughes @ Technologies of Awareness: Buddhism and the New Mind Sciences

Time Machine

If Only We Were Smarter!

The Baroque Body: The Role of Body Modification in Scott Westerfeld´s Uglies

Tech Pace Fast, Opposition Uncertain: IEET Readers


comments

Marianne Waldow on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

CygnusX1 on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

Mike Treder on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

CygnusX1 on 'If Only We Were Smarter!' (Mar 21, 2010)

splashjc on 'Avatar: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly' (Mar 21, 2010)







Subscribe to IEET News Lists

Daily News Feed

Longevity Dividend List

Catastrophic Risks List

Biopolitics of Popular Culture List

Technoprogressive List

Trans-Spirit List



Also check out technoprogressive multimedia on Thoughtware.tv

IHEU- Appignani Humanist Center for Bioethics and
Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies present

Human Rights for the 21st Century
Rights of the Person to Technological Self-Determination

May 11-13, 2007
New York City




Speaker

Michael Vassar

Columbia University

Michael Vassar has been analyzing the likely impacts of nanotechnology and other transformative changes for Futurist.com for three years. He lives in New York City where he divides his time between Columbia University and working with Internet-based startup businesses.

Lead Me Not Into Temptation: Folk-Psychological Conceptions of Willpower and Their Implications for Policy Listen to talk here

Neither Liberal, Conservative, nor Libertarian political philosophies usually give much explicit attention to the concept of willpower (entirely conceptually seperate from “free will”).  However, some examination shows that variation in how it is concieved of appears to be the basis for ideological conflicts between the partisans of different views.  Until matters of fact are clarified and resolved, they may appear to be conflicting values, and the appearent conflicts may appear irresolvable.  Not only that, the opposing partisans may appear insane.  In this presentation I will explain how conceptions of willpowe as abundant, limited, or muscle-like, e.g. limited but renewable and capable of being cultivated and increased, imply different policy proscriptions corresponding to political divides.  I will attempt to outline the necessary experiments that should enable us to determine how willpower actually works or to build better metaphors in its place, and will examine the impact of the appearently dominant views with respect to cognitive liberty.

HOME | ABOUT | FELLOWS | STAFF | EVENTS | SUPPORT  | CONTACT US
SECURING THE FUTURE | LONGER HEALTHIER LIFE | RIGHTS OF THE PERSON | ENVISIONING THE FUTURE
CYBORG BUDDHA PROJECT | JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION AND TECHNOLOGY

RSSIEET Blog | email list | newsletter | Podcast
The IEET is a 501(c)3 non-profit, tax-exempt organization registered in the State of Connecticut in the United States.

Contact: Executive Director, Dr. James J. Hughes,
Williams 229B, Trinity College, 300 Summit St., Hartford CT 06106 USA 
Email: director @ ieet.org     phone: 860-297-2376