Subscribe Join Our Facebook Group
MULTIMEDIA: Massimo Pigliucci Topics Can SETI Find Another Technological Civilization?
Neil deGrasse Tyson on Why He Doesn’t Call Himself an Atheist
“SMBC” Webcomic
Psychiatric Diagnoses: Science or Pseudoscience?
On Being a Utilitarian in the Real World
On the Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience
On the Computational Theory of Mind
Maarten Boudry on Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem
On The Science Of Climate Change
Dr. Paul Offit On Believing in Magic in Medicine
On the “Hard Problem of Consciousness”
Online Dating
Why does the universe exist?
Michael Shermer and Massimo Pigliucci On the Role of Science in Morality

Subscribe to IEET Lists Daily News Feed
Longevity Dividend List
Catastrophic Risks List
Biopolitics of Popular Culture List
Technoprogressive List
Trans-Spirit List

Massimo Pigliucci Topics
Rights > Vision > Contributors > Massimo Pigliucci > FreeThought > Sociology > Philosophy
Massimo Pigliucci
Reflections on the skeptic and atheist movements by Massimo Pigliucci

Groucho Marx, one of my favorite comedians of all time, famously wrote a telegram to a Hollywood club he had joined, that said: “Please accept my resignation. I don’t want to belong to any club that will accept me as a member.” I have recently considered sending such a letter to the skeptic and atheist movements (henceforth, SAM), but I couldn’t find the address.

Rights > HealthLongevity > GlobalDemocracySecurity > Vision > Contributors > Massimo Pigliucci
Massimo Pigliucci
From the Archives (2009): David Chalmers and the Singularity that will probably not come by Massimo Pigliucci

David Chalmers is a philosopher of mind, best known for his argument about the difficulty of what he termed the “hard problem” of consciousness, which he typically discusses by way of a thought experiment featuring zombies who act and talk exactly like humans, and yet have no conscious thought (I explained clearly what I think of that sort of thing in my essay on “The Zombification of Philosophy”).

Vision > Galactic > Contributors > Massimo Pigliucci > HealthLongevity > Innovation
Massimo Pigliucci
SpaceX, a somewhat critical look by Massimo Pigliucci

I’ve been a bit baffled recently by the enthusiasm that so many friends and colleagues have been displaying for SpaceX and the whole idea of commercial space “exploration.”

Vision > Bioculture > Contributors > Massimo Pigliucci > Philosophy > Psychology
Massimo Pigliucci
On parapsychology by Massimo Pigliucci

If we really pride ourselves on our critical thinking we ought to be able to take other people’s best arguments on board and show if and why they are mistaken. And Maaneli did make a very good argument in defense of parapsychology.

Rights > HealthLongevity > Vision > Contributors > Massimo Pigliucci
Massimo Pigliucci
On Coyne, Harris, and PZ (with thanks to Dennett) by Massimo Pigliucci

Oh dear, I pissed off the big shots among the New Atheists — again. If you are on Twitter or happen to have checked a couple of prominent NA blogs recently, you will have noticed a chorus comprised of none other than Jerry Coyne, Sam Harris, PZ Myers and, by way of only a passing snarky comment, Richard Dawkins — all focused on yours truly. I’m flattered, but what could I have possibly done to generate such a concerted reaction all of a sudden? Two things: I have published this cartoon concerning Sam Harris, just to poke a bit of (I th...

Vision > Contributors > Massimo Pigliucci > HealthLongevity > Philosophy
Massimo Pigliucci
Is information physical? And what does that mean? by Massimo Pigliucci

I’ve been reading for a while now Jim Baggott’s Farewell to Reality: How Modern Physics Has Betrayed the Search for Scientific Truth, a fascinating tour through cutting edge theoretical physics, led by someone with a physics background and a healthy (I think) dose of skepticism about the latest declarations from string theorists and the like.

Rights > HealthLongevity > Personhood > Vision > Contributors > Massimo Pigliucci > Psychology > ReproRights
Massimo Pigliucci
The sciphi of gay adoption by Massimo Pigliucci

Gay marriage is rapidly becoming less and less controversial, at least in the Western world. Yes, the battle hasn’t been won just yet, both in Europe and in the US, but we are getting there at a pace that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago.

Rights > HealthLongevity > Vision > Contributors > Massimo Pigliucci > Philosophy
Massimo Pigliucci
What virtues, and why? by Massimo Pigliucci

Here comes another post on ethics! This one is, I must admit, somewhat meta-ethical, despite my recent post about the limited value of meta-ethical discussions when it comes to debates in first-order ethics. As I pointed out in the discussion that followed that essay, it’s not that I don’t think that meta-ethics is interesting, it’s just that it shouldn’t be used as an excuse for refusing to get down and dirty about actual everyday moral questions.

Rights > HealthLongevity > Personhood > Vision > Contributors > Massimo Pigliucci > FreeThought > Philosophy
Massimo Pigliucci
The philosophy of suicide by Massimo Pigliucci

In a forthcoming episode of the Rationally Speaking podcast, Julia and I discuss the philosophy and science of suicide, i.e. what empirical inquiry tells us about suicides (who commits them, how, what are the best strategies for prevention) and how philosophical reflection may lead us to think of suicide. In this post I will focus on the philosophical side of the discussion, for which an excellent summary source, with a number of additional references, is this article by Michael Cholbi in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, to which I w...

Vision > Virtuality > Galactic > Contributors > Massimo Pigliucci > Philosophy
Massimo Pigliucci
Mathematical Universe? I ain’t convinced by Massimo Pigliucci

So the other day Julia Galef and I had the pleasure of interviewing mathematical cosmologist Max Tegmark for the Rationally Speaking podcast. The episode will come out in late January, close to the release of Max’s book, presenting his Mathematical Universe Hypothesis (MUH). We had a lively and interesting conversation, but in the end, I’m not convinced (and I doubt Julia was either).